this are my
posts & replies in the Friendster groups’ Filipino Architetcs’
topic thread on renewing PRC licenses and the IAPOA-R.A. 9266 thing…
this is my stand. this is Objectivism
(you might also want to view the whole thread by pointing to this link: http://www.friendster.com/group-discussion/index.php?t=msg&th=719914&start=0&
Sat, 08/25/07 08:13 AM
i
have this grudge against those people who “invented” this iapoa thing.
its [...]
this are my
posts & replies in the Friendster groups’ Filipino Architetcs’
topic thread on renewing PRC licenses and the IAPOA-R.A. 9266 thing…
this is my stand. this is Objectivism
(you might also want to view the whole thread by pointing to this link: http://www.friendster.com/group-discussion/index.php?t=msg&th=719914&start=0&
Sat, 08/25/07 08:13 AM
i
have this grudge against those people who “invented” this iapoa thing.
its a total discrimination and exploitation and blackmail.
it’s not right to force people, us architects in particular being
professionals at that, into participating in “groups” if one doesn’t
want to. it’s blackmail! they’re ‘forcing” us to have this iapoa
membership by threatening us of taking away our RIGHT to OWN the plans
we’re suppose to submit to the government.
they will discredit our rights just because we don’t have this iapoa
number. what for? i mean our prc license are nothing if we dont have
this iapoa ek ek. what’s the use of taking the board exam and getting a
license if this iapoa will just scrap it away?
this is anti-human and immoral. to apply FORCE to us is IMMORAL!!! IAPOA IS IMMORAL.
————————
Tue, 08/28/07 01:01 PM
kung ito ay iringan lamang at pataasan ng ihi ng PIA at UAP, ano naman
ang kinalaman ng mga LISENYADONG ARKITEKTO (ng PRC) na minarapat na
hindi umanib sa anumang organisasyon?
bakit kelangang takutin itong mga indibidwal na ito at ipagkait sa kanila
ang kanilang SINUMPAANG karapatan dahil lamang sa hindi pag-anib sa organisayong ito?
unang una, ang tinutukoy ko po rito ay mga LEHITIMONG Arkitekto sa bisa
ng SINUMPAANG tungkulin na ipinagkaloob ng PRC mismo. ito ang sinasabi
kong ibinabasura lamang ng IAPOA sa halagang P500!
karapatan ng bawat indibidwal na umanib sa mga organisadong grupo. NGUNIT karapatan din ng isang indibidwal na HINDI umanib.
ang kanyang hindi pag-anib ay hindi nangangahulugang hindi nya na pwedeng itaguyod ang kanyang propesyon.
ang pag-anib sa mga grupong ito ay hindi rin nangangahulugan na hindi
ka na magiging magaling na Arkitekto. maaaring makakapulot ka rito ng
ibang impormasyon subalit hindi lang ito ang pamamaraan sa pagningas ng
ating kakayahan at pagkalap ng impormasyon.
ANG AKING PANAWAGAN:
sa mga gusto ng IAPOA (pagsapi sa UAP o PIA), karapatan nila ito at malaya silang maging miyembro.
subalit sa mga minarapat na huwag ng sumali sa kahit alinmang
organisasyong ito, ay sana nama’y bigyan din ng kalayaan sa kanilang
piniling desisyon. huwag takutin at huwag nawang tanggalan ng
karapatang maging ARKITEKTO dahil lamang sa di pag-anib sa mga grupong
ito.
ang mga ganitong pamamaraan ay pagtanggal sa karapatang maging malaya.
tayo po ay nasa malayang bansa. may malayang kaisipan, may malayang
pananaw. bukod sa lahat, may kalayaang mamuhay ayon sa ating sariling
pasya at di dahil sa dikta sa atin ng iba.
OBLIGASYON ng
GOBYERNO at BATAS na pangalagaan ang mga karapatang ito at hindi ang
baliin at agawin sa kahit sinupaman -propesyonal man o hindi!
———————–
Thu, 08/30/07 12:33 PM
FREEDOM IS ABSOLUTE. when it’s not, when it’s twisted, it’s no longer freedom.
The concept of freedom rests on a government limited to the
protection of individual rights. The law should not try to force people to act morally. Its sole purpose is to promote individual liberty,
and by doing so, create the conditions necessary for someone to live
his life. We should be free to live our lives however we as individuals
see fit, with the one rule that we cannot use physical force against other people.
Everyone should be free from coercion by others. Each person can then
make their own choices in life, and follow through with them. If
someone else disagrees with how you’re living your life, they’re free
to say so and even try to persuade you to act otherwise. But they cannot force you to.
Freedom exists when there are limitations on government, limitations imposed by the principle of individual rights.
Philippines
is a republic, under which government is restricted to protecting our
inalienable rights. You are free to criticize your neighbors, your
society, your government–no matter how many people wish to pass a law
censoring you.
The job of the government is to protect our freedom. This is the very reason Marcos was ousted. We do not want a dictatorial kind of policy!
———————–
Sat, 09/01/07 07:10 AM
there is a big difference between FREEDOM and ANARCHY.
to IMPOSE is to dictate and therefore does not spell freedom. and in
this case the enforcement of a twisted law under the guise of the so
called “new architecture law”.
true, what can we do now that
it is already in effect? what else but to SUBMIT or else you LOOSE your
right to implement your concept into reality. another building
conceived in the mind yet trampled upon by this dictatorial “LAW”.
what a waste.
it’s a wonder why many people “RIDE” on the fame
or talents of others just to make it tick by joining groups and sucking on some other people’s ideas.
in a free world “LAW” means the SAFEGUARDING of FREEDOM.
to IMPOSE by the use of “LAW” is called “DICTATORSHIP”! and that, we don’t want.
and what we mean by the ABSENCE of LAW is ANARCHY. another thing that we don’t want.
FREEDOM IS ABSOLUTE! no buts
Theme designed by The Design Canopy
WPMU Theme pack by WPMU-DEV.
TAMA yan hindi na sana tayo idamay diyan sa kalokohan ng mahilig mangpolitiko sa isang propesyonal na lihitimo naman.ayosin na lamang nila ang gusot nila…pweeee